Since this is a holiday weekend, the customary end of summer, I
thought a little more music was in order. Why not celebrate with
another Stan Kenton piece?
This one, recorded in 1977, features my favorite incarnation of the
Kenton group - with a number of local (to me) connections.
Lead trombonist Dick Shearer, as I mentioned last time, retired to
my hometown - where I'd gone to high school with the brother of
Kenton's baritone sax player, Alan Yankee. Stan's drummer, Gary
Hobbs, also settled in Oregon. The trombone soloist on this piece,
Jeff Uusitalo, eventually made his home just across the river in
the Vancouver (Washington) area - where the sax soloist, Terry
Layne, grew up and went to high school.
Small world. But, asSteven
Wrightreminds us, “I
wouldn’t want to have to paint it.”
Have a good weekend, and don’t be surprised if I take Monday
off!
One consistent theme amongst the less informed is that all you need
worry about in a defensive encounter is that it’s a
“good shoot.” Nothing else, according to these keyboard
commandoes, matters - you can do anything, as long as the shoot is
"clean."
The trouble is that neither you, nor they, get to decide what's
"clean" and what's not. In my state, a Grand Jury makes the first
decision, and if they say it isn't "clean" it then goes to a trial
jury to make the final decision. They're the ones who will
scrutinize any self defense shooting, and the pseudonymous
self-appointed experts from your favorite forum will be
conspicuously absent.
You see, what looks "clean" to you may not look "clean" to another
person. Even if you explain it in detail they may still not see it
your way, especially if it's a jury weighing your explanation
against someone else trying to convince them of the opposite.
Malicious prosecutions and lying witnesses exist, and they don't
make that job any easier.
For those of you who still don't get this concept, I urge you to
run over to theArmed Citizen's Legal Defense Network and read this
month's Journal. It is devoted to the story
of Larry Hickey, who just recently won his freedom after two trials
that stemmed from a defensive shooting. His ordeal, recounted in
complete detail, serves as a caution to all those who still believe
in the myth of the "clean shoot."
Don’t get me wrong - I’m not saying that you
necessarily need to indulge in some fearfully exaggerated
lawyer-proofing of your defensive preparations, but you do need to
understand that you can’t run around like Rambo, either. This
article dramatically illustrates the the value of knowing how to
interact with the police after you’ve been involved in a
shooting, the need to be able to articulate why you did what you
did, and how evidence can be ignored, lost, or even turned to your
disadvantage.
The article runs twenty-two pages, and I believe it to beinvaluablefor anyone who carries a gun
for self defense - and should be required reading for anyone who
pontificates about legal issues on gun forums. The Journal is in
PDF form; here's adirect linkto that file.
Someone sent methis linkto a tale of a Ruger Redhawk
whose barrel had parted company from the frame. It's anold story; not this particular
occurrence, but the problem in general.
---
Seems that a certain Canadian manufacturer of simulated munitions
now has some competition. I've always disliked the existing
company's elitist insistence on only selling to police and military
buyers, and Speer, the maker of the new product, looks to change
that. Their new product,Force On
Force, will be sold not just to
the public sector but to "professional instructors" as well.
They've even got portable enclosed shoothouses available! Cool
stuff from a solid, responsible AMERICAN company. (Thanks toFear & Loadingfor the tip!)
---
DPMS was apparently the prime sponsor for a match called the
"Tri-Gun Challenge", which was recently cancelled. What's
interesting isn't the match, but ratherwhy it isn't going
to happen this year. The range on which it was
to be held was slapped with an order prohibiting the firing of
handguns on the property. When the range/club was founded 30 years
ago, they allowed all kinds of guns to be shot. In 1995 they were
issued a conditional use permit for a trap and rifle range, and
their neighbors apparently are alleging that the shooting of
handguns violates that permit!
This is hardly unusual. My wife and I belonged to a gun club a few
years back, a club which had been in existence since 1952. The
conditional use permit under which we operated stated that no
camping was allowed. Once a year, however, the Boy Scouts used the
club facilities for a two day shooting party, with a sleepover the
intervening night. The kids camped out in the classroom, but a
couple of the den mothers brought camping trailers (for obvious
reasons.) One particularly nosy neighbor, a recent transplant from
another state, spotted the trailers and notified the county. We
were hit with a similar order for violating the CUP.
People with an irrational fear of guns will always find a way to
cause problems. Don't believe for an instant that because we won in
the Supreme Court, the gun prohibitionists have been
defeated.
When I was in high school my dream was to play trumpet in
theStan
Kentonband. Kenton's organization
was for years the most progressive, innovative big band in all of
jazz. Their sound was decidedly different than any other big band,
and that alone attracted fans (of which I was one) and detractors
(of which there were many.)
Narrow-minded jazz listeners complained that Kenton didn't "swing",
that you couldn't dance to his music. Musicians, though, understood
what he was doing and were the backbone of his fan base.
Kenton made it a point to seek out the most progressive composers
and the most difficult music with which to demonstrate the sheer
power of his orchestra. Over the course of nearly four decades, no
matter what the prevailing jazz style was Kenton would turn it on
its ear and make it sound fresh.
As a result of his uncompromising attitude toward the advancement
of America's indigenous music, Kenton attracted the best and
brightest musicians. A list of his personnel over the years reads
like a who's who of jazz, and I hoped that I could someday make the
grade.
Then, thirty-one years ago this week, Stan died - and with him, the
legendary band that he led. My own dreams suddenly vanished. (Not
that I would have made it; frankly, in retrospect I wasn't nearly
good enough. Youthful enthusiasm served to mask that reality until
well into adulthood.)
To give you a taste of what Kenton's band could do, here's a video
from 1972 featuring aHank
Levycomposition titled
"Chiapas." The musically inclined will notice the tune was written
in 5/4; odd time signatures were something of a Levy trademark.
(The trombone soloist is Dick Shearer, who ironically would retire
to the small town where I had grown up listening to recordings of
him with Kenton. He spent the last years of his life within sight
of my childhood home.)
The blogs are alive with talk of women and guns (and not a single
mention of theexcellent
magazine, sadly.)Bane,Giddings, andAndrewshave, amongst others,
weighed in on the topic.
But there is something oddly...familiarabout this whole
meme. Could it be because I covered thisover a year and a half
ago?
Over the years I've gotten a
number of inquiries about becoming a gunsmith. I've dashed off
short answers to some, but was forced to ignore many others simply
due to the amount of information that the answer demands. Here in
full (or as full as I'm going to get) is my advice on becoming a
gunsmith.
First let's consider what kind of gunsmith we're talking about.
Some "gunsmiths" are really nothing more than parts changers -
people who can disassemble a gun, manage to figure out what part
needs replacing, order one from Brownell's, and reassemble the gun
with the new part. It might even run when they're done! At this
level there is very little money to be made; most such people are
employed at minimum wage, perhaps slightly better, by sporting
goods and "box" stores. They'll usually spend most of their time
mounting cheap scopes on cheap rifles - that is, when they're not
stocking shelves and attending to other rather menial retail tasks.
This is the kind of job that a mailorder "gunsmithing" course
qualifies one to hold.
The next step up is the ability to fit ready-made parts and make
minor adjustments to actions. If the timing of someone's S&W
revolver is off, people at this level can drop in a new hand, do
the necessary minor fitting, and hand the customer a gun which
functions again. A person with these skills might be able to do
simple action work, smoothing out the roughest parts of a trigger,
do bedding jobs on hunting guns, or perhaps assemble an AR-15 from
parts and perhaps have it function correctly. The money's a little
better, but one is still spending a lot of time putting scopes on
WalMart rifles. Such people are most likely working for someone
else - perhaps a local gun store - because there isn't enough value
in what they do to run a specialty shop.
This intermediate level MIGHT be learned via correspondence, IF the
person is mechanically inclined, inquisitive about the results, and
motivated to buy many broken guns and learn on them. It does
require hands-on experience, but the driven person can probably
learn on his/her own as long as enough reference materials are
procured.
At the top you have true gunsmiths. These are the talented men and
women who can make and fit stocks from scratch, who can fabricate
metal parts when necessary, who can diagnose complex problems and
correct them the first time, who can make a worn out and abused gun
look and work like new again. These people can actually make a
living as gunsmiths, sometimes a quite decent living, and virtually
always work for themselves.
It takes a broad range of skills and interests to be such a
gunsmith, though most (like me) specialize in one area. At this
level the most important skills are not necessarily gun-specific:
machining, welding, polishing and heat treating of metal, woodwork,
and finishing for both wood and metal. These are skills that need a
certain amount of equipment, and can't be learned from a mailorder
course.
Many such gunsmiths acquired knowledge from one of the dedicated
gunsmithing schools, though you'll find some very well-known
gunsmiths either came from a related field and self taught the
relevant firearms knowledge, or apprenticed to a Master in the
trade.
I'll confine the rest of my comments to becoming a true gunsmith as
I've defined the term. If you're serious about making a living,
this is the level to which you need to aspire.
First off, understand that you'll need excellent mechanical
aptitude, an inquisitive nature, and a drive to do nothing but the
best in order to succeed. Without each of those, you simply won't
make it in this field.
If you are starting from scratch, the best course of action is
probably to attend one of the dedicated gunsmithing schools. There
are perhaps a half-dozen around the country, but the two I'm
familiar with are both in Colorado: Trinidad College and Colorado
School of Trades. I've met graduates from both schools and have
been impressed with their skill and professionalism. This isn't to
say that the other schools don't turn out good graduates, only that
these are the schools whose graduates are familiar to me.
If for some reason you can't make it to such a school, all is not
lost. It will take a little longer, and you'll have to do it
piecemeal, but it can be done with resources that are likely to be
in your area. What follows will sound roundabout, but should serve
to impress upon you the wide range of skills a gunsmith must
have.
If you're not mechanically inclined, you'll need to be introduced
to the principles of mechanical devices. Auto repair courses are
available in every community college and are a great way to get
used to seeing how parts interact, anticipating and diagnosing
problems, and generally getting comfortable with complex
mechanisms. (On a personal note, I find many people today
surprisingly averse to getting their hands dirty. Gunsmithing can
be a dirty job, and if you're at all squeamish about such things an
automotive course would be a good attitude adjuster.)
Many adult education programs across this country feature courses
in clock repair, usually taught as a hobby to retired folks by
retired watch & clockmakers. These classes have most of the
advantages of an auto repair class, along with getting accustomed
to working with small parts. Starting this way will put you in good
company: I learned my mechanical skills as a teenager when I became
a clock and watchmaker, and another gunsmith you may have heard of
- Bill Wilson of Wilson Combat - started out as a watchmaker,
too.
The next step is to develop some relevant skills in metalwork. The
best way to do this is by taking every machine shop and welding
class your local community college offers. Learn how to work with
metal: forming, machining, hardening and tempering, finishing. If
you plan to do serious rifle work, you'll probably need to take
classes in woodcarving and fine furniture building too. The things
you'll learn in those classes are the things I do every single day,
and without that breadth of knowledge I could never accomplish the
work that I do. The "gun stuff" is relatively easy in comparison,
as long as those basic skills are in place.
If a tool and die making course is available to you, it would be a
great advantage to take it.
Once you have those skills in hand, you'll need to get some
extensive firearm-specific knowledge. You have several avenues;
first, you can attend some specialized (limited duration) classes
at the aforementioned schools to learn how to apply those skills to
guns. Another avenue is to take classes from a well-known gunsmith.
Ron Power and Bill Laughridge, for example, both offer weekend
classes on specific topics. Finally, you could apprentice to a
master gunsmith and work for him/her on an occasional basis to pick
up what you need. (Before anyone asks, no - I'm not currently
interested in taking on an apprentice!)
An extremely talented and motivated person could, possibly, get
this information from books, but not without the base skills
discussed above, and certainly not without mechanical
aptitude.
Because most of the good gunsmiths work for themselves you'll need
to have some talent in business management and sales/marketing.
Since this is a people business, those with unpleasant
personalities or poor communication skills will be at a
disadvantage. You have to like guns and you have to like gun
owners! These days a working knowledge of using the internet as a
business tool is almost a necessity, as is a good website.
To get started will require some capital investment on your part.
You'll need a suitable lathe, milling machine, welding equipment, a
wide variety of hand tools, air compressor, benches, tooling for
the lathe and mill, and a seemingly endless list of specialized -
and expensive - gunsmithing tools. A skilled machinist (which you
should be if you've followed my advice) can make many of them, but
there are many more that really need to be purchased. That runs
into money!
How much money depends on what you plan to do and how good you are
at bargain hunting, but you're unlikely to get in for less than
$20,000 unless you run into a string of screaming good deals.
(That’s on top of your schooling, of course.) I’ve
heard from a couple of gunsmiths who’ve done it recently, and
they tell me that two or three times that figure may be more
realistic if you’re buying mostly new tools. What you
specialize in will have a dramatic effect on your investment.
You'll need to have the resources to make that level of financial
commitment, plus the additional resources to weather the inevitable
startup phase. Plan on being without a solid income for at least a
year as you build your business. Every truly capable gunsmith I've
met has done it in a matter of months, but that's not a guarantee
that you can or that your market can support such growth. Plan for
the worst, and if it doesn't happen so much the better!
Finally, you'll find lots of failed "gunsmiths" in the internet
forums who will be glad to tell you how hard the gunsmithing trade
is: how expensive it is to get started, how you can't make a living
at it, and so on. Keep in mind that you won't find too many
successful gunsmiths hanging around those places, because we're
frankly too busy to bother!
Yes, it's a tough business. Guess what? All businesses are tough.
I've owned a number of business concerns in my life, and helped
start several others, and none of them were easy. Gunsmithing is no
different. Don't listen to the naysayers who got in thinking it
would be a sure thing, who thought that they could succeed despite
being ignorant and obnoxious. If you have the skills and the
business acumen, if you like dealing with people, and finally if
you like guns and shooting, you can be a successful gunsmith. All
it takes is hard work!
In 1935, a fellow by the name ofRoy
Strykerwent to work for the federal
government. Specifically, he took over the job of managing the
Historical Section of Roosevelt's Resettlement Administration.
Almost immediately the organization morphed into theFarm Security Administration, and his section became the
Information Division.
Without putting too fine a point on it, Stryker's job was
propaganda - to give the Administration what they needed to justify
spending money that they didn't have. To further this aim, he came
up with an idea: he'd send out a bunch of photographers to make
pictures that would both tug at America’s heartstrings and
provide support for Roosevelt's policies. He gathered a bunch of
talented people from varied backgrounds - writers, painters, and
budding photographers - and sent them over the country to make
pictures.
While we can certainly debate the means of the program, the ends
were spectacular. Stryker's team shot over 164,000 pictures,
producing hundreds of iconic images and launching the careers of
many talented photographers. So good was the group that they would
later be transferred to the Office of War Information to document
the country’s entry into World War II, though their tenure
would last only a year.
Of those hundreds of thousands of images they shot, only 644 were
in color. Color film was quite expensive, even for the government's
pockets, but more importantly couldn't be reproduced in the
newspapers of the day. Its use was therefore quite limited, and the
photos somewhat rare.
Here are 70 of those 644, including some from a
couple of my favorite FSA photographers: Jack Delano and Alfred
Palmer.
(What happened to Stryker? In 1943 he went to work for Standard
Oil, who foresaw the need to polish their own public image. Several
of the FSA photographers, now unemployed after the OWI cut them
loose, went to work to make Standard look good. They succeeded, and
the Standard Oil photographs of that period still stand as supreme
examples of industrial photography. It’s too bad that Stryker
died in 1975 - I’m sure BP could use his services right about
now.)
My latest article for the Personal Defense Network has just been
posted! This time I detail a malfunction drill for the
revolver.
It's fair to say that severe malfunctions with a revolver are much
less common than with autoloaders. Balancing that out is that fact
that the malfunctions that can occur are often more serious, in
that they can tie up the gun enough to make it non-functional for
the duration.
In theFriday
Surprise for the 6th, there were two bonus
questions. A couple of people came close, but didn't get all the
details. The Leopolds referred to in the title were Leopold Mannes
and Leopold Godowsky, friends who happened to be professional
musicians and amateur photo chemists. Their work in color film led
directly to the invention of Kodachrome. The connection with
Rhapsody in Blue? The song's composer, George Gershwin, had a
sister named Frances - who was married to Godowsky.
---
It seems odd to me, but I get lots of inquiries about where to buy
targets. My favorite source isLaw Enforcement
Targets, which carries a huge line
of paper and cardboard products. For defensive and "tactical"
training, their stuff is the best. My other source, which carries
more traditional targets (NRA, IPSC, and IDPA) isAlco Target
Company. I've done business with
both for years, and have never had a reason to complain.
---
I've mentioned this before, but do check out the forums over at
thePersonal Defense Network. There are some great
discussions there, and the only thing missing is YOU!
I grew up a small-town farm kid, the son of parents who themselves
had grown up on farms, and the major thrill of my summer vacation
was always fair season.
Our county fair would come first, followed by the "big one" - the
Oregon State Fair. (All the counties were pretty much the same,
exceptHarney
County. Their fair inexplicably
occurredafterthe state fair.
Always has, as far back as I can remember, and they're awfully
proud of that.)
The county fair was a place where citizens could gather, interact,
watch the local talent perform, and show off their produce and
handiwork. It combined socialization and competition, along with
some entertainment, and was a vital component of farm and ranch
life in the 19th and well into the 20th century.
People from all corners of the county would bring their livestock,
produce, and the things they made to display and compare to the
same from others. Those items found superior would win their
owners/creators a ribbon and a year's worth of bragging rights,
while those that didn’t make the grade would cause a stern
resolve to win next year. It was always friendly competition, but
there was definitely an undercurrent of antagonism when it came
time to judge the pies and preserves!
What I remember most from my childhood were the tractor displays.
The various agricultural equipment dealers would bring a large
selection of the newest tractors and implements, while the local
farmers would bring in their oldest equipment for a taste of the
"good ol' days." For me, if there aren't tractors it just ain't a
fair.
Today county fairs have become caricatures of their former selves,
many looking like a cross between Cirque de Soleil and a college
dorm beer bust. Our modern State Fair? Well, the less said about
that the better; the last time I went it was nearly unrecognizable,
and I haven’t been back.
The rural county fairs, thankfully, have managed to hold on to
their noble ancestry better than those closer to the metropolitan
areas. In the outlying fairgrounds you can still get a taste of
what a county fair should be.
I plan to do just that this weekend. While folks in the cities mock
the "rednecks" of this country, I'll be celebrating the worth and
dignity of those who produce the food that fills bigoted
stomachs.
I get emails. Crazy, some of them. (Not that I'm pointing any
fingers, but watch out for pharmacists.) After I said something
nice about theSteyr
autopistols, some assumed that I'd
somehow lost my bearings or that I’d been abducted and
replaced by a lookalike with absolutely no taste in firearms.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
As I've said more than once, I've been known to carry a
high-capacity autoloader when the circumstances warranted doing so.
I started my odyssey in defensive handgunning with an autoloader,
and for many years competed with single-action autos. They are
tools, just as the revolver is, that have their own set of
attributes that are different from those of the wheelgun. A
well-rounded shooter should be familiar with both.
It's worth revisiting that great scene from Quigley Down
Under:
So, what autoloaders do I like?
Efficient, reliable, accurate - those are the things I look for in
an auto. The Steyr impressed me because it possessed those
attributes in a decidedly different shape, and threw in an
advantage or two of its own. It owes its existence, though, to the
phenomenal success of another Austrian import.
Someone once told me that one of his instructors said that all
defensive handguns should be Glocks, and all Glocks should be Model
19s. I won't go quite that far, but the 19 is a superb choice. If
you catch me with an auto on my belt, that's probably what it's
going to be. It’s hard to imagine a better choice for the job
of protecting life and limb, and I trust the Glock beyond any auto
I’ve ever used.
It’s worth noting that the Glock isn’t the first
autoloader I’ve ever used; I’ve carried and competed
with a bunch of different autos over the years, and some are more
memorable than others.
I have a soft spot in my hear for the HK P7, though it's awfully
heavy for a low-capacity autoloader. It also gets unbearably hot
after a few magazines have been fired, has a horrendously heavy
recoil spring in the slide, and the version with the thumb-operated
magazine release has a disturbing tendency to drop said magazine at
inopportune times. On the plus side they have beautiful triggers,
are phenomenally accurate, and the low bore axis (combined with the
aforementioned weight) make for very pleasant shooting. I carried
one for many years, but have long since moved on to more practical
armament.
As I said, I competed for many years with cocked-and-locked autos.
Of course I went through the obligatory 1911 phase, but mine was
less protracted than most. My father, a WWII Army Air Forces vet,
used to complain about the 1911: "you couldn’t hit the broad
side of a barn with one of the things, but that's OK because they
didn't work half the time!" That didn't stop me from lusting after
one, but the affair was short-lived. Perhaps Dad had an influence
on me after all!
After that I did the Browning/Saive Hi-Power thing but settled on
the CZ-75 pattern for competition. My favorite incarnation was the
5" Magnum Research Baby Eagle, aka the IMI Jericho. It was, in my
experience, the most reliable CZ clone as well as being the most
comfortable to use. (I remember trading my last one for a S&W
625, which I later sold.)
Today, though, it's Glock all the way. They are a superb defensive
tool for those times when a revolver isn't suitable.
The roll was shot by photojournalist Steve McCurry, and the images
on it range from New York to India to Parsons, Kansas - where the
last Kodachrome processing line is located. It, too, will be going
the way of the dinosaur this December, when the equipment will be
shut down for good.
Bonus points: can you
decipher the meaning of my title? Extra bonus points if you can do
so without a search engine; super extra bonus points if you can
tell me how 'Rhapsody in Blue' is related to
Kodachrome.
A few years back Steyr Mannlicher USA imported a batch of their M9
and S9 pistols. They were polymer framed, striker fired guns of the
type popularized by their fellow Austrians at Glock, but that's as
far as the similarities went.
The Steyr guns featured a steeper grip angle, more ergonomically
sculpted grips, a lower bore axis, and better triggers. Like all
Steyr products, they were superbly constructed of quality
materials.
Sadly they've been unavailable in this country for a few years, the
high cost of quality Austrian workmanship and the unfavorable
exchange rates having combined to make them uncompetitive in the
marketplace. Things have stabilized a bit and once again Steyr USA
is importing the MA-1 and SA-1, which are the second generation
versions of the original M9 and S9.
My wife routinely carries an S9, which is the compact version, and
is very happy with the gun. It's proven to be reliable, accurate
and a pleasure to shoot. The trapezoidal sights take some getting
used to, but work well for their intended purpose. The original
guns were criticized for the smoothness of their grips, which the
second generation have changed to be "grippier."
A recent email from a reader asked about protecting guns from rust
in long-term storage. There are many approaches to the problem,
most of them involving some type of coating or oil.
I prefer wrapping the piece in a Volatile Corrosion Inhibitor (VCI)
paper. VCI paper is coated with chemicals that vaporize to provide
a protection layer against moisture and rust. Properly used in a
sealed container (like a Zip-Loc bag), it can provide years of
complete protection.
You're
reading... The Revolver Liberation
Alliance! The blog about revolvers,
training, self-defense, and shooting in general (along with an
occasional surprise!)